Belknap Superior Court

Lack of Due Process Deficiencies

• Violation of Due Process 10/6/23 – present
• Critical concerns regarding initial unlawful detainment and seizure
• Unlawful Trespass and violent attack by State Troopers inside private property
• Uncalled for private property damage by The State of New Hampshire
• 26 Days unlawfully imprisoned without conviction (bail denied)
• Three (3) days and (3) nights in solitary confinement
• Subjected to cruel and unusual punishment
• Nationality attacked by The State and The Court
• Coerced and forced medical procedures while falsely imprisoned
• DNA and Biometrics stolen while unlawfully imprisoned
• TB “Test” forced up private autonomy – now have tinnitus all the time
• Fair and speedy trial averted due to a prolonged detention
• No counterclaim filed
• Inequitable proposed Settlement Conference terms
• Discovery delayed by The State for over 100 days (about four months)
• No Discovery elements received prior to the Settlement Conference
• Unlawful restrictions as conditions upon being released
• Harsh approach by the Court, raises concerns about equitable treatment
• Biased relationship between The State and The Court
• Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [Rule 12(b)(6)]
• Securities Fraud per CUSIP Results: 27826Y571

Trespasses

Identity theft, misrepresentation, unlawful conversion, impersonation, kidnapping, inland piracy, enslavement, peonage, press-ganging, gross breach of trust and violation of commercial contract, violent armed racketeering, felony theft, threat of death, false arrest, vandalism, international bank fraud, unlawful and illegal securitization, false claims of usufruct, international securities fraud, murder on paper, false claims of death and waiver of estate, false claims of foreign citizenship and foreign citizenship obligations based on undisclosed adhesion contracts, mischaracterization of nationality, mischaracterization of political status, attempted seizure of my person(s) under false presumptions of statelessness, incompetence and dependency, human trafficking, false and coerced registration and application processes, false claims of voluntary and consensual participation in foreign pension and taxation programs, illegal contracting processes including Third Party contracts, contracts with minors and purported incompetents and violation of my constitutional guarantees, misuse of my estate assets as donations to foreign public charitable trusts, foreign land trusts and foreign unauthorized service contract.

Notice of State of NH Violations to Date

• Notice of Violation of guarantee of procedural due process
• Notice of Violation of precepts of fundamental fairness

OATH OF OFFICE

• Notice of Violation of 5 U.S.C. § 3331 – OATH of Office

Title 12 U.S. Code

• Notice of Violation of  12 U.S. Code § 411 – Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption

Title 18 U.S. Code

• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 471 – Obligations or securities of United States
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 472 – Uttering counterfeit obligations or securities
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 473 – Dealing in counterfeit obligations or securities
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 475 – Imitating obligations or securities; advertisements
• Notice of Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1661 – Robbery ashore

Title 22 U.S. Code

• Notice of Violation of 22 Tex. Admin. Code § 159.205 – Identity Theft

Title 42 U.S. Code

• Notice of Violation of 42 U.S. Code § 1981 – Equal rights under the law
• Notice of Violation of 42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights
• Notice of Violation of 42 U.S. Code § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA)

• Notice of Violation of FARA Compliance (https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara)
• Notice of Violation of The False Claims Act Title 31 U.S.C.A. Section 3729 (a) and (7)
• Failure to Provide IRS 1099OID(s) – For Stolen Credit and counterfeit Securities
• Notice of Violation of Bill of Rights – all 10 Articles

United States of America Constitution of 1789

• Notice of Violation of  Amendment I guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment II guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment III guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment IV guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment VI guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment VII guarantees
• Notice of Violation of Amendment VIII guarantees

Case Law – Roadside Stops

See Annual Report of the Attorney General of the State of New York issued on July 21, 1909, ALBANY NEW YORK, pages 322-323 which reads: “There is NO requirement that the owner of a motor vehicle shall procure a license to run the same, nor is there any requirement that any other person shall do so, unless he proposes to become a chauffeur or a person conducting an automobile as an employee for hire or wages. Yours very truly, EDWARD R. O’MALLEY Attorney General. See Laws of New York 1901, Chapter 53, page 1316, Section 169a.

Private Automobile is NOT required to be registered by Law The California Motor Vehicle Code, section 260: Private cars / vans etc. not in commerce / for profit, are immune to registration fees:

(a) A “commercial vehicle” is a vehicle of a type REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code.”

(b) “Passenger vehicles” which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation or profit, and house cars, are not “commercial vehicles.”

(c) a vanpool vehicle is not a “commercial vehicle.

The California Constitution in Article I, Section 8 and similar statements made in all other state constitutions, mandates that no one “be compelled to be a witness against himself,” is in agreement with the Supreme Court ruling in Haynes v. U.S., 390 U.S. 85, 88 S. Ct. 722, wherein the ruling was that to force anyone to register anything is communicative, and such communicative evidence is precluded by the 5th Amendment

“No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring, licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.” Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22.

The fundamental Right to travel is NOT a Privilege, it’s a gift granted by your Maker, and restated by our founding fathers as Unalienable and cannot be taken by any Man / Government made Law or color of law known as a private Code [secret] or a Statute, To Wit:

“The right to travel is a part of the ‘liberty’ of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. So much is conceded by the solicitor general. In Anglo Saxon law that right was emerging at least as early as Magna Carta. Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125

“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by a carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a City may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579.

“Right of protecting property, declared inalienable by constitution, is not mere right to protect it by individual force, but right to protect it by law of land, and force of body politic.” Billings v. Hall (1857), 7 C. 1

“The people of the State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.” Added Stats. 1953, c. 1588, p.3270, sec. 1

“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.” Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94

“Failure to obey the command of a police officer constitutes a traditional form of breach of the peace. Obviously, however, one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if that command is itself violative of the constitution.” Wright v. Georgia, 373 U.S. 284, 291-2.

When officers detained appellant for the purpose of requiring him to identify himself, they performed a seizure of his person subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment, of course, applies to all seizures of the person, including seizures that involve only a brief detention short of traditional arrest. Whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has ‘seized’ that person, and the Fourth Amendment requires that the seizure be ‘reasonable’.

“But even assuming that purpose [prevention of crime] is served to some degree by stopping and demanding identification from an individual without any specific basis for believing he is involved in criminal activity, the guarantees of the Fourth Amendment do not allow it.”

“The application of a code to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers lacked any reasonable suspicion to believe appellant was engaged, or had engaged, in criminal conduct. Accordingly, appellant may not be punished for refusing to identify himself, and the conviction is reversed.” (Probable cause) Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, (1979)

“Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle

Deceptive, undisclosed contracts and personage (impersonation) used to presume living people’s acquiescence and consent are unacceptable fraudulent and they are crimes! Waive any foreign obligations or unearned benefits and retain the absolute right to hold everyone involved in such matters 100% commercially and personally liable for any harm proposed against you, your property or your assets held in trust.

Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights is not a list of things the ‘government’ gave to us. It is list of things they want to take away from us. They cannot take our unalienable rights without our consent, just like if they cannot cut off our fingers, toes…or any other bodily appendage we were born with without our consent. The ‘government’ offers ‘Civil Rights’, which are benefits and privileges, NOT rights. Always remember that which can be given can be taken away! Civil rights are for U.S. Citizens (fictitious corporate citizens), not living people. It is 100 percent our public duty is to exercise our rights. If we do not, then we are accomplices to their crimes.

Article I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Article II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Article III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Article IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Article V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Article VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Article VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Article VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Article IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Article X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Workshop 1

<Workshop 3>

$ <price>

In Planning

<Event 3>

$ <price>

In Planning